Thursday, May 21, 2009

"Facts? We don't need to teach you no stinkin' FACTS!"

Here in Texas, we don't need to worry about silly things like scientific facts when we teach, like, science (I mean, really -- HOW are those even related!) Evolution? That's so weak. There is no proof! It's just a theory! We're not going to let the LIBERAL MEDIA brainwash our children with their "insufficient" theories on, like, evolution and the Big Bang and whatnot.

You see how much we value factual information in our classrooms. So it is really a surprise that we don't want no stinkin' medically-accurate information in our health classes?

So far the three bills introduced in the Texas legislature this session trying to get FACTS in sex ed classes have gone nowhere. What did these radical bills demand?
  • SB 1076 / HB 1567 "would require that information about contraception and disease prevention in sexuality education classes be scientifically accurate. It would also require that sexuality education classes not discourage sexually active people from using any form of contraception or method approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for reducing the transmission of sexually transmitted diseases."
  • SB 515 / HB 741 (Education Works) "would require that information taught in public school sexuality education classes be medically accurate. They would also require that schools teaching about sexuality education include information about the importance of abstinence and medically accurate information about contraception and other methods of responsible pregnancy and disease prevention."
  • SB 1100 / HB 1694 "would require that sexuality information taught to students be medically accurate and that schools inform parents about what they are teaching in sexuality education classes."
(emphasis mine)

RADICAL, I know. We are "stealing children's innocence" by giving them MEDICALLY-ACCURATE FACTS!!! How much more depraved can you get!

As Planned Parenthood of North Texas put it in an email sent out last night,

PPNT alerted you a few days ago that representatives in Austin were introducing amendments to an education-related bill (SB 283) that would require information taught in sexuality education courses be medically accurate. Thank you to everyone who called or e-mailed your legislator in support of these amendments!

Unfortunately, the House bill sponsor Rep. Mark Shelton (R-Fort Worth), who is a doctor, chose not to accept these amendments. They were then withdrawn after a point of order ruled they were unrelated to the subject of the bill. The bill pertained to School Health Advisory Councils (SHACs), locally appointed councils whose function (among others) is to recommend sexuality education curricula to their school boards.

This means there is no guarantee Texas' teens will receive factual information in their sex ed classes next fall.

Currently, Texas law does not require that the health curriculum in Texas classrooms be medically accurate. You might think such a law would be unnecessary, but a recent survey of sex education curriculum in Texas schools* found that almost half of what is taught is scientifically unsound.

However, the session is not over—any day now, the Texas Legislature could consider other bills that could restrict access to health care or information. Stay tuned for future updates.

*by the Texas Freedom Network Education Fund

(emphasis theirs, links mine)

Somebody remind me again why I live in this state?

8 comments:

  1. I live in a Bible Belt state as well although I don't think we've attacked the curriculum in quite the same way as Texas has. I laugh when I teach Shakespeare because I know if the folks beating their chests over sex-ed in health really understood the Bard's dirty jokes, he'd be on their hit lists too.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Kathy,
    Shh!!! Don't say that too loudly, or they'll come after English lit classes too!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's... just... *sigh* It's amazing the things that require such a fight, that one would expect to be so common sense.

    ReplyDelete
  4. +shakes head+ So sad how, when all we ask for are facts, cold hard facts, we get this bull in return.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Amen to the lying in the culturally-relevant gutter!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Because if you move away, who would be here to be outraged and attempt to make a difference?

    ReplyDelete
  7. I wish that anti-choice folks took an interest in eliminating unwanted pregnancies. It's such a contradiction! They don't give girls the info to prevent pregnancy, the don't want to give her a choice about what to do when she does get pregnant AND THEN they don't want to help her out with welfare when she becomes a mom. On how many fronts can we screw women at once?

    ReplyDelete